DAY OF THE TAMALE – A DIGRESSION FROM KNITTING

Well, three days of the tamale, to be exact.

A good friend of ours hosts a themed Christmas dinner every year. It started out as a “cats and dogs” gathering decades ago, when those who weren’t migrating home elsewhere for the holiday pooled resources and cheer. Over the years it has become a second-family type event, deeply enjoyed by all.

This year’s theme (announced last year) is Mexican food. And in a moment of ebullience and generosity some time after my third egg nog last year, I promised to make tamales for the 2006 crowd. Since tamales freeze well, I decided to do them this weekend. That way should the batch prove unsuccessful, I’d have plenty of time to recover.

Living here in Massachusetts, finding the ingredients can be a challenge. I’ve been collecting corn husks for a couple of years now, buying a bag when I can find them. Fresh peppers, or at least a small selection thereof, can be found here now. Dried peppers are tougher although in some neighborhoods they can be found, too. My own stock is hand-imported from New Mexico and Arizona, either by me during business trips, or through the kindness of another good friend in Albuquerque. And masa flour I can get locally in the local natural/organic food supermarket, or in the same neighborhoods where decent peppers can be found.

So this weekend I spent pretty much in the kitchen. Saturday was cooking the meat filling – in my case pork. Sunday was making the flour, stuffing the tamales and steaming them. And Monday after dinner was assembling and steaming the last few that I ran out of time to complete on Sunday.

I don’t claim to be an expert in making these (I am after all, a nice Jewish girl from Brooklyn, and Mexican only by marriage). My experience is largely a matter of reverse engineering, trying to make tamales that look, feel, and most of all – taste – as close as possible to the ones my father-in-law’s family sends to him. I’m narrowing in on the optimal product now, but I still have a few tricks to learn. Still, these do come out better than any I have had in any Mexican restaurant this side of the Mississippi. So as a mutant multicultural Hannukah/Christmas/Solstice/New Year’s present I share the recipe here.

Please note that these tamales are one of the 365 things you should only eat once per year. Luckily the amount of labor involved limits their appearance to special occasions. This recipe makes enough for a large party or family gathering (recommended), or at 4-5 per serving, enough to freeze for several months of tamale-accompanied meals (see caution on those 365 things).

One Gringa’s Tamales
Makes about 150-165

Special equipment: A huge mixing bowl. A large steamer pot (big aluminum Chinese steamers, large spaghetti pots with steamer inserts, lobster or crab pots with a colander inside all work). Optional: An electric mixer, an immersion blender. One or more helpers for husk-washing and tamale assembly (this is A LOT of hand work for one person)

Meat filling

  • 6 pounds of pork shoulder or another fatty, stringy cut, hacked into roughly inch thick slices and gobbets. Plus any bones and skin.

  • About a dozen assorted fresh hot peppers of various types (Fresnos, Serranos, Tepins, yellows, Mirabels, Jalapenos, Mirasols, Cayennes, I use a mix of anything I can find – except habaneros which can overwhelm the dish)

  • About 10 dried New Mexico dried chile pepper pods (use dried California Anaheim peppers if you can’t find the slightly more flavorful and hotter New Mexican ones)

  • About 15-25 other hotter dried peppers (tiny pequins, cascabels, or arbols, again whatever I can find)

  • 2 medium or one large onion, finely chopped

  • 6 cloves of garlic

  • 1 Tbs salt

  • 1 can of beer (or equivalent in water)

  • More water to cover

  • 1.5-2 tsp dried cumin (comino)

  • 2 tsp dried oregano

Day 1: Clean and de-seed dried peppers, soak in beer to rehydrate for at least a half hour. Char and peel fresh peppers. The delicate might want to wear gloves for both of these operations. Finely chop fresh peppers. Crush or mince garlic. Mince or chop rehydrated peppers, saving juice (I cheat by sticking an immersion blender into my beer or water plus peppers and turning the whole thing into a slurry). Toss meat and bones in large stew pot along with all other ingredients, add water just to cover. Simmer for at least two hours, preferably until mean is falling apart, and all the vegetables have denatured into the broth. Taste if you’re brave. The meat should be quite hot because it’s the primary flavoring in the tamale, but is used quite sparingly. Set aside to cool, preferably overnight in the fridge. If you’ve used skin-on shoulder, the broth will set up as gelatin in the fridge. That’s good.

Day 2: The fastidious might want to skim the fat off the top of the cooked meat. I will say as shocking as it sounds – don’t bother. The biggest enemy of tamales is dryness. This is a recipe that I’d rather have full fat once a year, than as a reduced fat shadow of its true self. While the meat is still cool, remove it from the pan (keep the jelled juice and fat – don’t wash the pot yet). Using two forks, shred the meat into strings. Use this opportunity to remove bones and any tough bits. Return meat to the pot and heat it just enough to melt the thickened juice. Pour off as much as is convenient. You’ll probably have between 2 and 4 cups of liquid inclusive of both broth and fat. The meat should be moist, but not dripping. Reserve the liquid and set the meat aside. Fridge both until you assemble the tamales.

Dough and Assembly

  • One 5-lb bag of Masa Harina instant corn flour (to be accurate, the bags are actually 4.4 pounds, I make up the difference from the cupboard)

  • 1 pound of lard. Yes lard. This actually makes a tastier and less greasy tamale than the equivalent in vegetable shortening.

  • 1 cup of Crisco shortening (reduce this by half if you are only using one 4.5 pound bag of masa). I use this only because I rarely use lard, and I don’t want to buy a second pound and have the remainder sit around forever.

  • 2 Tbs salt

  • The reserved liquid from the meat

  • Water or broth. You’ll probably need between 4 and 6 additional cups of liquid, depending on how much you got from your meat and how dry your masa mix is.

  • 2 bags dried corn husks

Start by immersing the corn husks in a pot of warm water to cover (you’ll need to weight them down with another pot on top to keep them submerged). Soak for at least two hours. They will almost certainly be a bit dirty, with clumps of dried corn silk in the centers of each bundle. Separate the husk leaves gently, taking care not to split them. Rinse well under running water. Stack them between dishtowels as you clean them. They need to be moist and pliable but not dripping wet when the tamales are assembled.

In a huge bowl (and I mean huge) using an electric mixer, beat the lard and shortening until soft and uniformly creamy. Add all masa and salt and mix by hand until all the fat is incorporated. The dough will look crumbly at this point. Add the liquid from meat – broth, fat and all. Knead to incorporate. Continue adding water (or broth) and kneading by hand until the mixture is just a bit softer than PlayDoh in consistency, sort of like a very stiff peanut butter.

By now your meat should be cool (it’s easier to handle cold). Your corn husks should be softened and clean. Your dough should be ready. It’s time to assemble. Assembly is where my lack of skill really shows. The tamales I’ve had made by my Mexican inlaws’ families are not fat and floppy masa cakes with an open end, like the packaged ones found at Trader Joes supermarkets. Instead they are stogie-thin, with both ends of the husk neatly tucked away to completely encase the filling. I’ve never managed to figure out that second end tuck, so I use a small tie to secure each tamale.

Start by taking roughly a cigar-sized lump of masa and squishing or spreading it onto one of the larger corn husks. Aim for an area slightly right of the center line. You want to make a patch about the width of a pack of playing cards that extends from about an inch from the pointy end of the husk to within about an inch of the wide end, and that is about a quarter inch thick.

tamales-2.jpg

Using a fork lay a thin stripe of meat mix down the center of the masa – depending on the size of the corn husk, this can be about a teaspoon or two. Remember – most of the hotness in this recipe is in the meat. The more meat, the hotter the tamale is. Even the hottest meat can be tamed by upping the masa:meat ratio.

tamales-3.jpg

Begin rolling the husk and masa tightly to encase the meat.

tamales-4.jpg

When you’ve got it mostly enclosed, stop rolling and fold the pointy end of the husk in over the growing roll.

tamales-5.jpg

Continue rolling to make a little log with one end tucked neatly away. Now take one of the substandard corn husks (there will be some too shredded or narrow to be useful). Rip off a thin strip and use it to tie the open end securely closed.

tamales-6.jpg

Put all your tamales into a the upper part of a steamer pot with the folded side down. They should be packed tightly enough to stay upright, but not so tightly that they don’t wobble a bit (otherwise they will take longer to steam).

tamales-1.jpg

Set the tamales to steam for about two hours. At the end of two hours pull a sacrificial tamale from the center of the batch. Unwrap it. If it’s done the filling will be moist but not sticky, and will separate cleanly from the husk. For the record, my large spaghetti pot/steamer basket can hold about 40 tamales at a time. I steam them as I complete them, and did three batches on Sunday and one Monday night. Unsteamed tamales should be returned to the fridge if they have to wait their turn to be steamed. Cooked tamales should be packed into zip-lock plastic bags or plastic containers and frozen as soon as they are cool enough to handle. It’s worth the time to freeze them in meal-sized units rather than all together.

To serve tamales, I thaw them quickly in the microwave or using a steamer. You can serve them just like that. But best of all once they have been thawed is to finish them by baking them in the oven until the husks are dry, or tossing them into a dry skillet or on a griddle to the same ends. Serve as an accompaniment with any Mexican meal, or as a snack or appetizer. Salsa Verde or any other condiment you wish can round out tamales to make a meal.

Enjoy!


Technorati :

STUPID I-CORD (AND EDGING) TRICKS, PART II

A quickie today.

There have been a few times when I’ve wanted to work I-cord (or a knit edging) onto the perimeter of something, completely encircling it, and ending up by grafting the final live stitches onto the original cast-on row with the hope of creating as near seamless a join as possible. Here’s an example:

sofa-1.jpg

To date when I’ve needed to do this, I’ve either knit several rows extra of the I-cord “free” prior to beginning to apply it to the edging, or I’ve used a provisional cast-on with waste yarn for wider knit trims. Working several rows of extra I-cord gives me a snip zone I can cut and then ravel back to produce the cast-on edge live loops I need for grafting. I suppose for narrow trims, I could do a similar thing – knitting several rows of plain garter or stockinette prior to beginning simultaneous application to the thing being trimmed and commencement of my trim pattern. A judicious snip and ravel back will reveal those live loops just as nicely as working sacrificial to-be-cut I-cord does.

But I had a “doh!” moment last night. Why not just cast those few first stitches directly onto a large safety pin or small stitch holder? Unclasp, transfer stitches onto a live needle, and go! To do this, I’d use the simplest of provisional cast-ons, starting out by holding my strand behind my stitch holder and picking one stitch up knitwise, then I’d shunt the yarn to the front of the holder and with my needle tip in back of it, pick up one stitch purlwise, and so on.

Here are seven stitches picked up on a stitch holder:

i-cordtrix2.jpg

It looks kind of like the figure-8 cast-on I favor for toe-up socks:

EXCEPT that by picking up the stitches instead of winding the yarn around the needles I’ve managed to mount every other stitch with the leading leg in back. Not a problem. I’d work one corrective row of purls back before beginning my edging, and on that row, I’d purl into that back leading leg to eliminate any inadvertently twisted stitches. Or I could reverse the direction of the stitch holder and wind the yarn on exactly the same way as I do for my fig-8 cast-on, eliminating the problem entirely.


Technorati :

LEFT TWIST (1X1 CABLE) – MINOR REFINEMENT

Just because there’s nothing in my world that doesn’t get tinkered with just for the distraction of the tinkering, I played a bit more with twist stitch directions last night, and found a minor refinement that (for me at least) improves the look of a left twist – the one where the rightmost stitch ends up on top of a 1×1 cable:

twist-7.jpg

I know the photo is very hard to make out (blame my cheap camera and poor skills), but in the purple circle is a left twist that looks a bit pinched at the bottom. That was done the way described yesterday, the way that’s outlined in Walker and most other books:

  • Identify your two-stitch unit. Skip the first stitch and knit into the back of the second, then knit BOTH stitches together through the back of the loop and slide the entire unit off your needle

I did almost the same thing to the twist in the red circle on the left – with one minor additional manipulation, shown in red, below:

  • Identify your two-stitch unit. Slip the first stitch knitwise, then return it to the left hand needle. Now knit into the back of the second, then knit BOTH stitches together and slide the entire unit off your needle

This flips that first stitch over and places its leading leg to the rear of the needle. This eliminates the slight twist that’s formed at the base of the topmost stitch. If you’re unfamiliar with the leading leg problem, there’s a short summary on it here.

Other than this minor epiphany and about an inch of the back of my Ribbed Leaf Pullover, not much got done here last night. I’m in the midst of holiday shopping (100% on-line), plus planning for our annual cookie deluge, and for the hand-made-tamales-to-feed-30 I promised would be ready for an annual holiday bash held on Christmas day. I also owe lots of personal replies to letters and notes. I’m getting there. Glub.


Technorati :

LEFT TWIST AND RIGHT TWIST

I got a note yesterday from someone who commiserated at the slow going doing a piece so full of left twist and right twist 1×1 cables, and who wanted to know if there were other ways to do them.

There are several ways to go about it. Some are documented in B. Walker’s stitch treasuries, others elsewhere. The first and most obvious is to do a plain old 1×1 cable, slipping the stitch that needs to go in back onto a cable needle or spare DPN, working the one that needs to land on top, then returning the slipped stitch to the active needle and working it, too. Nice and neat, but time consuming.

Some people have a knack for working these small cable crossings without using a cable needle or other aid to hold any stitches. This works best in a nice, cooperative and slightly sticky wool, but with practice can be employed in most other materials, too. Famous Wendy is especially good at it, and has a nice tutorial on no-needle cables on her website. Although it is employed there for a 3×3 cable, the same principle holds for a simple 1×1 twist. Grumperina also has an illustrated no-cable-needle tutorial. Her method is slightly different and works well, too.

But being a klutz and prone to dropping stitches, I prefer some of the other less adventurous methods. My irrational preference here is sort of like people who prefer to keep their fingers on the keyboard while using a word processing program, disdaining use of the mouse in favor of key command sequences.

Here are a couple of other ways to make 1×1 twists. B. Walker advocates the second method described below for each (the ones I attempted to illustrate). As with most cases in which there are several ways to accomplish the same thing, experimentation is always a good idea. Different methods will give different gauges and depending on the materials used, may have an effect on fabric drape and loft. If you’ve got a pattern that’s heavily dependent on LT and RT, take a moment to play with the various ways to accomplish them when you are swatching. You may find that one of the many ways to produce them works best for your project in hand.

Left Twist (LT) Methods – Rightmost stitch ends up on top

  • Identify your two-stitch unit. Skip the first stitch and knit into the back of the second, then knit the skipped stitch through the back of the loop and slide the entire unit off your needle.
  • Identify your two-stitch unit. Skip the first stitch and knit into the back of the second, then knit BOTH stitches together through the back of the loop and slide the entire unit off your needle

twist-1.jpg
Knitting into the back of the second stitch

twist-2.jpg
Knitting both together

twist-3.jpg
Completed twist unit

Right Twist Methods – Leftmost stitch ends up on top

  • Identify your two-stitch unit. Skip the first stitch and knit into the front of the second, then knit the skipped stitch and slide the entire unit off your needle.
  • Identify your two-stitch unit. Knit both stitches together, but do not remove them from the left needle. Knit the first stitch again, and slide the entire unit off your needle.

twist-4.jpg
Knitting both stitches together

twist-5.jpg
Knitting the first stitch again

twist-6.jpg
Both completed twists (placed a couple of rows apart, they make up the C shape in the center of the mini-swatch)


Technorati :

LEAF SWEATER PROGRESS

Back from a holiday sojourn with my husband’s family, I present my leaf sweater progress:

leafsweater-2.jpg

As you can see, the preponderance of twisted stitches (1×1 cables, not knit into the back of the stitch type twisting) do slow me down quite a bit. I can say however that I am almost done with the third 50-gram skein of Jaeger Matchmaker. Since I had just started the second before we left, I can attest to a modicum of progress. A couple people asked for close-ups of the texture pattern

leafsweater-3.jpg

Again, my poor photography skills do not do my object justice. This is however a very common twist stitch pattern, and appears as “Ribbed Leaf” on page 151 of B. Walker’s Second Treasury of Knitting Patterns. The Sarah James leaflet gives the directions in prose, very much akin to Walker’s. I however had to graph the thing out because I find working from charts much easier to do than working from prose. Here’s my chart:

Ribbed leaf.gif

On the holiday, we drove cross country from the Boston to Buffalo metro area, delighting in accompanying several zillion fellow travelers in the process. Thankfully most of them turned south and headed to New York City rather than trekking out across the upper part of the state with us. We spend a comfortable night in Utica, but send sympathy to Utica residents on what their local reviewers laud as an excellent restaurant. We found it to be grindingly mediocre at best (Italian restaurants whose sauces are both gummy and indistinguishable in texture from their pasta should be avoided). Also ear-splittingly loud.

The family and food at the end of the trip made the migration worth it, with the kids being thoroughly spoiled by their grandmother. And even us grown-ups had a chance to sneak out and have some fun visiting the Frank Lloyd Wright’s Martin House and the Roycroft cooperative over the weekend.


Technorati :

LEAF SWEATER AND TUBULAR CAST-ON

A day late, but not forgotten in the pre-holiday rush, I present progress on my Sarah James Ribbed Leaf Pullover:

leafsweater-1.jpg

You can see the wide twist-rib section; the tubular cast-on I used (my fave); and about 80% of the first full pattern row repeat. I’ve described the tubular cast-on before. You can also see the beginnings of the soft drape of the body, with just a bit of blousy fullness above the ribbing. My gauge is just a squidge looser than that recommended, but I am not worried about fit. I am at the top end of the pattern’s presented range of sizes. A bit more fullness won’t matter. Plus I have plenty of yarn. Two whole bags full – about six balls more than the pattern projects.

On the Jaeger Matchmaker DK, I can confirm my opinion yesterday. It’s soft. Very soft. Also a bit splitty for this particular use. I’d probably recommend a crisper, more tightly spun yarn for maximum texture effect, but this one is serviceable for the purpose and I like the hand of the fabric that’s resulting. I am a bit disappointed in quality though. I’m only on my second ball, and I’ve found more than a half dozen spots where a ply was spliced. No whole strand knots, but lots of repaired ply breakage. Most were large enough to be noticeable and I ended up cutting them out. That means more ends to end off. Also, I suspect that the luscious softness of this Merino yarn will display a typical weakness – pilling. I noticed that when ripping back, the yarn looks more used and fuzzy than I would normally expect. It mates with itself an exceptional amount for a superwash. All that easily encouraged surface fuzz usually bodes badly for pilling down the road. I’ll keep an eye on that.

In the mean time, I’ll be taking a computer vacation for a couple of days, and will catch up with both wiseNeedle and String after the holiday. If you’re in the US – may your long weekend be a pleasant one whether it be away with family or cozy at home. If you’re overseas, were my house to be big enough, I’d wish I could invite you all over for dinner.


Technorati :

PROJECT KICK-OFF – SARAH JAMES RIBBED LEAF MOCK TURTLENECK

Well, faced with all the knitting I HAVE to do, plus an upcoming holiday week with some time to (potentially) do some but with a limited noodling window, I have done the only impractical thing. I’ve opted to knit none of the above. I decided to do a commercial pattern with little or no alterations (for maximum mindlessness) and produce a sweater I can wear to work.

I’ve opted to knit Sarah James Ribbed Leaf mock turtleneck. I am using Jaeger Matchmaker, in a medium charcoal gray. I don’t see any on-line write-ups of anyone else who has tried this one, so I can’t compare/contrast experiences with other knitters.

I’ve gotten about one skein into the thing. Past the twist stitch ribbing (using my favorite tubular cast-on) and about two inches into the body. I did end up graphing out the texture pattern from the prose directions in the leaflet.

I have some cautions on this pattern. This is knit in DK or sport weight, at a gauge of 6.6spi. Two main body motifs (33 stitches) should equal 5 inches across. Gauge is taken over the pattern and if you knit up a gauge square according to the directions in the pattern, room exists for considerable error (more on this below). The entire pattern is produced using copious twist stitches, and they carpet every right-side row. Wrong-side rows are purled. The preponderance of twist stitches does make for slow knitting, and allows ample scope (for me at least) for stitches to be inadvertently dropped. I’ve had to go back several times now and rescue a loose stitch several rows back. Because of the heavy twisting, if I don’t catch a dropped stitch within one or two rows, I can’t easily ladder down and re-knit. All the entire intervening rows have to be ripped back and reworked.

Taken together these things mean that this pattern isn’t for those who like quick knits at big gauges and who are less than comfortable with precise patterning. It is good however for those who are looking for a very attractive project that will be wearable indoors and out; that will allow purchase of smaller gauge yarns that can often be found on special due to reduced demand; and that will take a while to complete (more knitting time per dollar invested).

Now on the problem with the gauge square instructions, the pattern directs the knitter to cast on 33 stitches and work Pattern 2 (the leaf motif body) for 28 rows. Then cast off, block or wash, dry, and measure the swatch – which should measure 5 inches square. The problem here is that for many knitters, the first several and last several stitches are not knit at the same gauge as the interior of the swatch.

Casting on only 33, then measuring edge to edge, taking these sometimes distorted stitches into account can introduce an error, making the gauge appear to be fewer stitches per inch than it actually is. Someone with this problem will find that their work ends up being smaller than expected based on their swatch. I’d advocate casting on for three repeats (49 stitches) and knitting more than the one full pattern repeat. The texture pattern however would make counting gauge very difficult. This can be addressed by taking two contrasting color lengths of sewing thread or other fine string and laying one between the 8th and 9th stitch and one between the 41st and 42nd stitch (there should be 33 between them). Every other row or so I’d flip the thread or string up the column, laying it through the the spot between those same stitches. Over time, the thread will look like it’s been basted through the work vertically, leaving clear lines between which gauge can be accurately measured. The same thing can be done with row count, threading a colored thread horizontally through a row life-line style a couple of rows up from the bottom, and a couple of rows before ending off, having counted out 28 rows from the first one marked. A larger than directed square of this type can now be washed, blocked and measured, and the gauge confidently extrapolated from the “prime” area so delineated in the center.

You wanted pix? Tomorrow. My camera is out of batteries.


Technorati :

BEGINNING TO BECOME HUMAN AGAIN

UPDATE:  AN EASY TO PRINT FULL PAGE VERSION OF THIS DESIGN IS NOW AVAILABLE AT THE EMBROIDERY PATTERNS LINK, ABOVE.

I met my major deadline today, and am beginning to decompress. The best way to do that is to think of something completely different, so I’ve begun to contemplate patterns in general, with some idle thought to my Spanish hat. So I began playing with motifs I have lying around. Like this one

tncmbits.jpg

I don’t think this particular one is great for the hat, but I have an odd fondness for it, plain as it is. As the source annotation states, it’s one of the patterns I included in The New Carolingian Modelbook. While it looks like it would be at home as a border on the wall of a 1950s era tiled bathroom, it does in fact date back to 1546 by specific annotation. It may well have appeared elsewhere, although most of the da Sera patterns are pretty unique to his books. (If you think pattern piracy is rife these days, you’ll not be surprised by 16th century publishing ethics).

This particular pattern would work as nicely for stranding or for knit/purl textures as it does in cross stitch or other forms of counted thread embroidery. In fact it would have a number of advantages if done in knit/purl:

  • Complete reversibility
  • Low curl factor – roughly equivalent amounts of knit and purl
  • Deep texturing – the knit/purl sections would pull in a bit like ribbing unless strongly blocked
  • Ease of memorization – purl rows mimic the lay of the knit rows below them, and there are only two different row patternings, alternating blocks of k2, p2, and alternating blocks of k6, p6

So I put it here in part to make up for the consternation I caused with yesterday’s subject line.


Technorati : ,

KNIT ANGORA BONDAGE CUFFS

First off, I want to warn and/or reassure everyone that there is no actual content anywhere on this site that relates to today’s subject line.

That line is however one of the many Google search topics that have landed people at this site. I’ve got several visitor statistics compilation tools attached to wiseNeedle. Some come as part of the hosting service package provided by the website ISP, some came with the dasBlog software The Resident Male used to build this new home for String. Between them they provide an interesting profile of visitors here, including some of the stranger ways they arrived. Now I can’t see from where exactly any one query originates, so please don’t worry that I know the topic above emanated from your individual computer or account. But I can see that someone on one particular day went to Google, typed in that phrase and wound up here.

Why? Because that person did a search that turned up pages that listed one or more of the words in that phrase. Knit I’ve got. Angora, too. It’s even possible that on the day in question, I mentioned work on the ribbed cuffs of an ongoing project. That’s three out of four hits on the admittedly unusual search phrase, so the seeker saw a listing for this site near the top of the probability of relevance sorted results page. (There are lots of ways to avoid this problem by targeting your searches with more precision. Google’s own tutorials are a good place to start).

Still, the search and visitor logs can be fascinating. I’ve seen a recent surge in traffic from Japan. Apparently the Kureopatora’s Snake Scarf has hit mini-fad status over there. I can even trace some referrals back to sites that show pictures of newly accomplished snakes nestled in pages full of text I haven’t a hope of reading. (Translation software helps some, but not much).

Most searches however are understandable. In the past 24 hours, I’ve seen them for

  • free knit gift patterns
  • spool knitter cow
  • how do i make a swatch
  • strickfingerhut Australia
  • Montse Stanley
  • Forest Path Stole
  • Visio Stencils
  • Solve for values of X
  • Upscale beanie weenies

and some for yet another topic that appears nowhere on this site: “knit pattern g string pasties.”

My conclusion from all this – Knitters are looking for lots of information. And some of them lead far more exotic lives than mine.

On my own knitting – I’m not quite surfaced from deadline hell. I’ve had just enough spare time to tend to processing in yarn reviews and answering advice board questions. I have an inbox full of personal notes to answer, plus a couple of questions to answer that appeared here as String comments. Apologies to everyone who has waited so patiently, wondering if I’d fallen off the edge of the world. I’m still clinging on, and hope to climb back fully by the weekend.


Technorati :

SIGH

I am still mid-frazzle with work deadlines, and will be so for the bulk of the coming weekend. I have to say I came home last night too tired to knit, or even think about knitting. I have a pile of stuff that needs doing, but no get up and go to get up and get done.

For example, I have to finish off my Wave scarf. I’m up to the point where the ends of the edging need to be grafted together, and the hole that developed just after the start pf the edging where my yarn broke needs to be mended. I’ve got the Spanish Hat to plot out. Another table is in need of a protective runner. There are holiday socks to be started. I do have a head start on some gift knitting this year, with several scarves and sock pairs knit in idle moments lagered away against need.

There are also some long-standing residents of my Chest of Knitting Horrors(tm). Halloween arrives each and I feel them haunting me. I generally try to finish off at least one in November/December. In particular this year is the Rogue pullover in the dragon skin texture stitch pattern I started for Elder Daughter. That has had its front partially unraveled in a knitting accident (comic but annoying in retrospect). I need to figure out what the heck I was doing, rip back to a stable point and move forward.

And then there are the various other stitching projects I’ve been thinking of lately, curtains and the like for the house. Plus the figuring out what enlightening or entertaining knit-related articles I should be posting here, and working on the wiki (which is languishing as well for want of time.)

But I’m too harried right now to do much more than think of this pile of what is supposed to be fun work with anything else besides a lingering and wistful guilt. So apologies here. No enlightenment, no entertainment. Just a whiny blogger’s typical post full of self-indulgent sighing.


Technorati :